<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging for Cash?</title>
	<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/</link>
	<description>An eclectic mix of technology, news comment, and personal notes.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Blogging for Cash? by: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-393</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 20:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-393</guid>
					<description>Dave,

I'm with you - blogs that are trying to make cash are generally (with some exceptions, perhaps) spending too much time looking at ad stats and not enough time writing content.

-Fruey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dave,</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m with you - blogs that are trying to make cash are generally (with some exceptions, perhaps) spending too much time looking at ad stats and not enough time writing content.</p>
	<p>-Fruey
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Blogging for Cash? by: Marinade Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-391</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-391</guid>
					<description>I think advertising cheapens a blog. Same thing with those 'Make a Donation' buttons. Why would I want to send a total stranger my money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think advertising cheapens a blog. Same thing with those &#8216;Make a Donation&#8217; buttons. Why would I want to send a total stranger my money?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Blogging for Cash? by: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-382</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 08:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-382</guid>
					<description>Hi Dave,

Bloggers are often storytellers: your little nuggets of nostalgia shared amongst online aquantainces can be enlightening or fun to read.

I was listening to the radio yesterday when &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marguerite_Duras&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Marguerite Duras&lt;/a&gt; was quoted as saying something roughly translated as &quot;It's a lie to say that writers write for them. I write for the collective you&quot;. If nobody reads your writing, you don't write. If you're on a desert island, you don't write. 

Most storytellers aren't running adverts all over their sites; are bloggers who do make money advertising working harder on the moneymaking or the storytelling?

-Fruey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Dave,</p>
	<p>Bloggers are often storytellers: your little nuggets of nostalgia shared amongst online aquantainces can be enlightening or fun to read.</p>
	<p>I was listening to the radio yesterday when <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marguerite_Duras" rel="nofollow">Marguerite Duras</a> was quoted as saying something roughly translated as &#8220;It&#8217;s a lie to say that writers write for them. I write for the collective you&#8221;. If nobody reads your writing, you don&#8217;t write. If you&#8217;re on a desert island, you don&#8217;t write. </p>
	<p>Most storytellers aren&#8217;t running adverts all over their sites; are bloggers who do make money advertising working harder on the moneymaking or the storytelling?</p>
	<p>-Fruey
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Blogging for Cash? by: Marinade Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-380</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 19:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-380</guid>
					<description>I know I'll never be a Hemingway, but I do enjoy writing. It keeps my creativity alive and it's an extension of what I've been doing for many years now, as a graphic artist. Plus, I've met some pretty neat people like you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I know I&#8217;ll never be a Hemingway, but I do enjoy writing. It keeps my creativity alive and it&#8217;s an extension of what I&#8217;ve been doing for many years now, as a graphic artist. Plus, I&#8217;ve met some pretty neat people like you.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Blogging for Cash? by: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-376</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-376</guid>
					<description>David

It's been an enlightening debate. Good to see you here, hope to hear back on your online ad performance soon.

-Fruey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>David</p>
	<p>It&#8217;s been an enlightening debate. Good to see you here, hope to hear back on your online ad performance soon.</p>
	<p>-Fruey
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Blogging for Cash? by: David</title>
		<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-374</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-374</guid>
					<description>I think that would be very interesting. My experience, although a couple of years have passed for the client side, is that when the ad is placed in the correct site and position it can return as high as 8 x 1K while a poorly placed (content wise) ad can be as bad as 1 x 10k.

My most successful have been when using sponsoring/sponsored links. Considering client acquisition costs this method worked out significantly better than Newspaper, radio and television. I will be experimenting over the next months with a sponsor program and I will let you know how it turns out.

This method takes time and something needs to be thinking about the business and its objectives. I think this attitude is not very prevelent in today's companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think that would be very interesting. My experience, although a couple of years have passed for the client side, is that when the ad is placed in the correct site and position it can return as high as 8 x 1K while a poorly placed (content wise) ad can be as bad as 1 x 10k.</p>
	<p>My most successful have been when using sponsoring/sponsored links. Considering client acquisition costs this method worked out significantly better than Newspaper, radio and television. I will be experimenting over the next months with a sponsor program and I will let you know how it turns out.</p>
	<p>This method takes time and something needs to be thinking about the business and its objectives. I think this attitude is not very prevelent in today&#8217;s companies.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Blogging for Cash? by: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-373</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-373</guid>
					<description>David,

The niche that your blog is in (tourism, geography, Europe) is a good place for targetted advertising to work quite well. I'm not against it per se. 

One interesting thing is how few articles I've seen by companies who have really tracked their online advertising and made all their ROI decisions that way. I know there are companies that do it, but very few reveal much about themselves.

-Fruey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>David,</p>
	<p>The niche that your blog is in (tourism, geography, Europe) is a good place for targetted advertising to work quite well. I&#8217;m not against it per se. </p>
	<p>One interesting thing is how few articles I&#8217;ve seen by companies who have really tracked their online advertising and made all their ROI decisions that way. I know there are companies that do it, but very few reveal much about themselves.</p>
	<p>-Fruey
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Blogging for Cash? by: David</title>
		<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-372</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-372</guid>
					<description>Fruey - I have been in the Internet since before the browser (uucp and talk) and have built 2 successful telco networks one for Internet only and the other converged. I have never believed in the pay per click model and probably would have made more money had I followed the trend but I cannot embark on an adventure that I do not believe to be in the best interest of the client.

I also cannot see a future in the keyword payment structure and I agree it will stop. I am also in agreement about bulk package purchasing and have been both supplier and client. I think the ad agencies will become &quot;smarter&quot; and choose better over time and a good blog will draw higher revenues than the mass.

I started writing my blog because people were continuously sending me emails about how to visit Italy and why things were different. I have since decided to promote Italian products (tourism, wine, foods) and work with Italian companies that desire to penetrate the US market.

The ads for me are more of a learning experience and I try to get them to contribute content for things my readers might like. I am not sure it is actually doing what I desire but seems to be doing ok.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Fruey - I have been in the Internet since before the browser (uucp and talk) and have built 2 successful telco networks one for Internet only and the other converged. I have never believed in the pay per click model and probably would have made more money had I followed the trend but I cannot embark on an adventure that I do not believe to be in the best interest of the client.</p>
	<p>I also cannot see a future in the keyword payment structure and I agree it will stop. I am also in agreement about bulk package purchasing and have been both supplier and client. I think the ad agencies will become &#8220;smarter&#8221; and choose better over time and a good blog will draw higher revenues than the mass.</p>
	<p>I started writing my blog because people were continuously sending me emails about how to visit Italy and why things were different. I have since decided to promote Italian products (tourism, wine, foods) and work with Italian companies that desire to penetrate the US market.</p>
	<p>The ads for me are more of a learning experience and I try to get them to contribute content for things my readers might like. I am not sure it is actually doing what I desire but seems to be doing ok.</p>
	<p>David
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Blogging for Cash? by: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-371</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-371</guid>
					<description>David

The current boom in AdWords - both on Google and on blogs - makes me nervous. I see blogs claiming they come up with tactics to get $9 clicks and stuff like that, but really that's just piggybacking on what I think is a temporary phenomenon. If you track advertising properly, you'll notice that buying a click that's not even a sales lead won't be worth $9 to anyone soon.

The extra space on non professional blogs is probably what keeps the whole market for pay per click inflated. Clever keyword targetting and SEO tactics are the scourge of Google, so expect them to try to stop it.

As far as your readership vs. Dallas Morning News, I expect they package most online campaigns with print advertising or whatever. Being a pure online player and selling advertising, even well targetted, is a tough way to earn a living. 

In any case, I think your conclusion is right: over time these things will work out. Right now, I'm not bothering with any advertising. I'm not in it for the money, and if I were I can think of a lot of other stuff more lucrative than blogging in order to pull in an online income. But just maybe, a blog about what that other stuff is would be a good focus to drive traffic.

-Fruey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>David</p>
	<p>The current boom in AdWords - both on Google and on blogs - makes me nervous. I see blogs claiming they come up with tactics to get $9 clicks and stuff like that, but really that&#8217;s just piggybacking on what I think is a temporary phenomenon. If you track advertising properly, you&#8217;ll notice that buying a click that&#8217;s not even a sales lead won&#8217;t be worth $9 to anyone soon.</p>
	<p>The extra space on non professional blogs is probably what keeps the whole market for pay per click inflated. Clever keyword targetting and SEO tactics are the scourge of Google, so expect them to try to stop it.</p>
	<p>As far as your readership vs. Dallas Morning News, I expect they package most online campaigns with print advertising or whatever. Being a pure online player and selling advertising, even well targetted, is a tough way to earn a living. </p>
	<p>In any case, I think your conclusion is right: over time these things will work out. Right now, I&#8217;m not bothering with any advertising. I&#8217;m not in it for the money, and if I were I can think of a lot of other stuff more lucrative than blogging in order to pull in an online income. But just maybe, a blog about what that other stuff is would be a good focus to drive traffic.</p>
	<p>-Fruey
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Blogging for Cash? by: David</title>
		<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-370</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/24/blogging-for-cash/#comment-370</guid>
					<description>The problem of &quot;lack of professionality&quot; you describe is one of the greatest problems but as you also point out the number of bloggers is increasing thus the good ones will, over time, become reference points.

I also agree that bloggers are, on whole, losing money. I think this is a question of supply-demand on both the publishing and advertising agency side. On the publishing side there are many, many sites and most of them &quot;non professional&quot; increasing the available number of sites to advertise on driving down prices. On the advertising procurement side there are a limited number of agents giving them greater control over commissions, type of advertising etc. that a site receives. For the blogger this is a double whammy thus most bloggers lose money.

Spam is another problem but I think this will go the road of the spam that we receive everyday in the mailbox, most often, immediately discarded.

I think there will be, in the future, profit margins in blogging. Currently my readership is 10% that of Dallas Morning News. Most of my readers are in a very specific market segment which makes them very valuable to the proper advertiser. The problem is that I could never ask 1K$ for an advertisement as the paper could even though on a per reader basis my site is most likely more effective.

Over time these things will work out. I do not think that business can ever really afford to get involved in the content side except for what already happens in the Pump and Dump message boards for stocks.

Good site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The problem of &#8220;lack of professionality&#8221; you describe is one of the greatest problems but as you also point out the number of bloggers is increasing thus the good ones will, over time, become reference points.</p>
	<p>I also agree that bloggers are, on whole, losing money. I think this is a question of supply-demand on both the publishing and advertising agency side. On the publishing side there are many, many sites and most of them &#8220;non professional&#8221; increasing the available number of sites to advertise on driving down prices. On the advertising procurement side there are a limited number of agents giving them greater control over commissions, type of advertising etc. that a site receives. For the blogger this is a double whammy thus most bloggers lose money.</p>
	<p>Spam is another problem but I think this will go the road of the spam that we receive everyday in the mailbox, most often, immediately discarded.</p>
	<p>I think there will be, in the future, profit margins in blogging. Currently my readership is 10% that of Dallas Morning News. Most of my readers are in a very specific market segment which makes them very valuable to the proper advertiser. The problem is that I could never ask 1K$ for an advertisement as the paper could even though on a per reader basis my site is most likely more effective.</p>
	<p>Over time these things will work out. I do not think that business can ever really afford to get involved in the content side except for what already happens in the Pump and Dump message boards for stocks.</p>
	<p>Good site!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
