<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reading RSS? Subscribed by e-mail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/reading-rss-subscribed-by-e-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/reading-rss-subscribed-by-e-mail/</link>
	<description>An eclectic mix of technology, news comment, and personal notes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/reading-rss-subscribed-by-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caperet.com/?p=107#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Hi CT

Given the space in your sidebar for feeds, I imagine it does nonetheless affect your readership. My stats suggest that the RSS feeds are the most read files on my server, but I expect that bots (automatic checks by Yahoo!, Google, etc) account for a lot of that.

I prefer reading on the site itself for most blogs, however RSS feed tracking helps me know which sites have updated. If an article isn&#039;t of interest to me, I won&#039;t go over to the site. There are also some sites that are difficult to read, but have interesting content. RSS allows you to read the site in a simple formatting style.

In terms of opinion on advertising: I don&#039;t go for it personally - maybe if I suddenly had stacks of traffic I might consider some discreet advertising, but I&#039;m not in it for the money.

-Fruey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi CT</p>
<p>Given the space in your sidebar for feeds, I imagine it does nonetheless affect your readership. My stats suggest that the RSS feeds are the most read files on my server, but I expect that bots (automatic checks by Yahoo!, Google, etc) account for a lot of that.</p>
<p>I prefer reading on the site itself for most blogs, however RSS feed tracking helps me know which sites have updated. If an article isn&#8217;t of interest to me, I won&#8217;t go over to the site. There are also some sites that are difficult to read, but have interesting content. RSS allows you to read the site in a simple formatting style.</p>
<p>In terms of opinion on advertising: I don&#8217;t go for it personally &#8211; maybe if I suddenly had stacks of traffic I might consider some discreet advertising, but I&#8217;m not in it for the money.</p>
<p>-Fruey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.caperet.com/2006/02/reading-rss-subscribed-by-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caperet.com/?p=107#comment-349</guid>
		<description>Not a believer in feeds. I provide them, and insert ads on them, but I&#039;d rather visit the website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a believer in feeds. I provide them, and insert ads on them, but I&#8217;d rather visit the website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

